TULIPS study
TULIPS stands for Talk, Understand, Listen for Inpatient Settings. The TULIPS project was as a trial that looked at the impact of employing a psychologist on inpatient mental health wards. The overall aim of the project was to increase access to psychological therapy on mental health inpatient wards and test its effectiveness.
Key information
- Study duration: October 2018 to March 2024
- Chief Investigator: Prof Katherine Berry
- Part of the Complex Trauma & Resilience Research Unit (C-TRU)
- Sponsored by the University of Manchester
- Funded by the National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR)
- Took place at Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GMMH)
What was the study about?
When people are admitted to a mental health ward, it is usually because they are experiencing severe distress or crisis. Access to psychological therapies, such as cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT), is uncommon on these wards, despite national guidelines recommending that people with severe mental health difficulties should be offered therapy alongside other care.
Our team worked closely with people who have first-hand experience and expertise of inpatient care for mental health to understand the barriers to delivering and receiving therapy on wards and how to overcome them. We reviewed existing research, carried out interviews and workshops, and tested different ways of offering therapy.
From this work, the team created the TULIPS intervention, which aimed to increase patient access to talking therapies in a number of different ways depending on each person’s needs and preferences. To help deliver the intervention, a psychologist was based on the ward 2 ½ days per week and trained and supported other staff in psychological therapies.
The TULIPS intervention was tested on 34 mental health wards. Half of the wards were randomly selected to deliver the TULIPS intervention for seven months, whilst the other half continued providing care as usual without a psychologist.
Researchers compared the two groups of wards to see whether the TULIPS intervention improved patient wellbeing, reduced serious incidents, and supported staff. Feedback was further gathered from both patients and staff on their experiences of the care they received during the TULIPS project. We also looked at how closely the TULIPS approach was delivered as planned.
What did the study find?
Wards using the TULIPS model saw a 19% drop in overall incidents of harm to self and others compared to usual care: although this reduction was not big enough for us to be confident it did not occur by chance, it represents around one fewer incident in every five. Whilst there were no significant changes in patient outcomes, staff on TULIPS wards with a psychologist also felt a stronger sense of personal achievement and were less emotionally exhausted by the end of the research.
32 staff and 31 patients were interviewed about their experiences of the TULIPS project. Through these interviews, we found that patients who experienced the TULIPS approach on their ward felt more listened to, understood, and supported. Ward staff reported that psychologists helped them respond with more care and compassion and gave them confidence in supporting their patients’ emotional needs. Overall, patients and staff agreed that it was important to have therapy available during admission, and patients wanted this type of support to continue after discharge.
TULIPS resources
We developed a range of resources during the TULIPS trial, including training slides for staff, workbooks, an intervention manual and a welcome pack. Please click on the link to open a downloadable copy in a new tab.
1. Initial training
- TULIPS initial training (.pptx)
- Blank formulation template (.docx)
- Formulation template for Gary (.docx)
2. Anxiety
- Anxiety staff training (.pptx)
- Anxiety group slides (.pptx)
- Anxiety group handouts (.doc)
- Coping with anxiety workbooks (.doc)
3. Depression and suicidality
- Depression and suicidality staff training (.pptx)
- Coping with depression and suicidality workbooks (.doc)
4. Depression and low mood
- Depression and low mood staff training (.pptx)
- Depression and low mood group slides (.pptx)
- Depression and low mood workbooks (.doc)
5. Psychosis
- Psychosis staff training (.pptx)
- Psychosis group slides (.pptx)
- Psychosis group handouts (.doc)
- Coping with distressing experience of psychosis workbooks long version (.doc)
- Coping with distressing experience of psychosis workbooks short version (.doc)
- Coping with distressing experience of psychosis additional worksheets (.doc)
6. Personality disorders and emotion regulation
- Personality disorders and emotion regulation staff training (.pptx)
- Personality disorders and emotion regulation staff handouts (.pptx)
- Personality disorders and emotion regulation group slides (.pptx)
- Personality disorders and emotion regulation group handouts (.pptx)
7. Anger and aggression
- Problematic anger and aggression staff training (.pptx)
- Understanding anger and aggression groups slides (.pptx)
- Coping with problematic anger and aggression workbooks (.doc)
8. Self-esteem
9. Self-harm
- Self-harm staff training (.pptx)
- Self-harm group slides (.pptx)
- Self-harm group handouts (.doc)
- Coping with self-harm workbooks (.doc)
10. Delivering sessions
- Delivering sessions 1-2-1 staff training (.pptx)
- Delivering sessions 1-2-1 and group staff training (.pptx)
11. Intervention manual
12. Therapist training
13. Welcome pack
TULIPS publications
See our publications about this research project here:
- Thompson JE, Haddock G, Penn G, Berry K. (2026) Inter-rater reliability of the Team Formulation Quality Rating Scale (TFQS) in inpatient mental health teams. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, epub. Full article available here.
- Johnston, I., Edge, D., Wilson, P. et al. (2025). Increasing access to psychological therapy on acute mental health wards: Staff and patient experiences of a stepped psychological intervention. BMC psychiatry, 25(1), 300. Full article available here.
- Johnston, I., Morley, H., Gilworth, G. et al. (2025). Conducting qualitative research on acute mental health inpatient wards: Lessons from the field. PloS one, 20(3), e0319609. Full article available here.
- Berry, K., Johnston, I., Wilson, P., et al. (2025). Barriers to the implementation of psychosocial interventions on acute mental health wards: An ethnographic observational study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1501945. Full article available here.
- Berry, K., Handerer, F., Bucci, S. et al. (2024). Ensuring that psychological interventions are delivered as intended on mental health inpatient wards. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(2), 371-384. Full article available here.
- Berry, K., & Hartwell, R. (2023). Using CBT interpersonal team formulation on mental health inpatient wards. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 79(6), 1551-1561. Full article available here.
- Berry K, Raphael J, Haddock G, et al. (2022). Exploring how to improve access to psychological therapies on acute mental health wards from the perspectives of patients, families and mental health staff: qualitative study. BJPsych Open, 8(4), e112. Full article available here.
- Jacobsen, P., Haddock, G., Raphael, J., et al. (2022). Recruiting and retaining participants in three randomised controlled trials of psychological interventions conducted on acute psychiatric wards: top ten tips for success. BJPsych open, 8(4), e125. Full article available here.
- Berry, K., Raphael, J., Wilson, H. et al. (2022). A cluster randomised controlled trial of a ward-based intervention to improve access to psychologically-informed care and psychological therapy for mental health in-patients. BMC Psychiatry, 22, 82. Full article available here.
- Raphael, J., Hutchinson, T., Haddock, G., et al. (2021). A study on the feasibility of delivering a psychologically informed ward‐based intervention on an acute mental health ward. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 28(6), 1587-1597. Full article available here.
- Raphael, J., Price, O., Hartley, S. et al. (2021). Overcoming barriers to implementing ward-based psychosocial interventions in acute inpatient mental health settings: A meta-synthesis. International journal of nursing studies, 115, 103870. Full article available here.
- Raphael, J., Haddock, G., Edge, D. et al. (2020). Conducting a consensus conference to design a psychology service model for acute mental health wards. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 59, 439-460. Full article available here.